In an era where brand reputation is closely tied to social and environmental consciousness, the business world often finds itself at a mandatory crossroads.

 

Sincerely altering one's DNA by genuinely transforming and embracing the social causes of its benefactors, the customers, or opting for the faster and more immediate path of social communication, often vague and dubious.

 

The increase in companies supporting social causes has over the years sparked some skepticism, urging consumers to scrutinize more closely the authenticity behind their public proclamations.

​

In this landscape, in the boardrooms of global corporations, one can easily imagine the widespread adoption of a new strategy, encapsulated by The Young Economist in the term, from which the Ever-Green-Washing Newsletter also takes its name.

 

Coined to encapsulate the art of presenting a facade of corporate virtue, this practice involves the strategic deployment of marketing prowess to create the illusion of genuine commitment to social or environmental causes. As companies navigate the fine line between profit and purpose, doubts persist about the sincerity of their promises.

​

Genuine brand activism requires more than just alignment with popular social and environmental causes; it demands a deep commitment to substantial change within the corporate reality itself.

 

Authentic activism necessitates transparency, unwavering dedication to addressing the roots of social and environmental issues, and a willingness to go beyond mere rhetoric.

​

Even more so in a time when the informed choices of consumers wield unprecedented influence over brands, individuals play a key role in demanding corporate responsibility.

 

To counter Evergreen-washing, a complete paradigm shift is necessary, recognizing authentic realities from mere communicative choices and allowing the consumer to increasingly choose which brands to reward and which to punish based on their transparency and corporate essence.